How to Choose a Conference to Publish Your Paper

Photo by Luis Quintero on Pexels.com

There are several factors that I take into account when choosing a conference to publish at. The first is obviously the quality of the conference. I only want to publish at conferences that are well-regarded and have a good reputation. The second is the location of the conference. I prefer conferences that are located in convenient locations so that I can easily get to and from the conference. The third is the size of the conference. I generally prefer smaller conferences so that I can have more one-on-one time with the other attendees.

I think that the most important thing to remember when choosing a conference to publish at is to choose one that is a good fit for your paper. Not all conferences are created equal, and some will be better suited for your paper than others. It is important to do your research and make sure that you are submitting your paper to a conference that is likely to accept it.

I usually use WikiCFP together with the Norwegian Register to help me choose a good conference. WikiCFP is a great resource for finding open calls for papers for conferences and workshops in many different fields. I can browse by field or by location, and I can also view the most recently added conferences. The Norwegian Register is a Norwegian database that includes information about scientific journals, series, and publishers. I use this database to find information about the quality of the conference, particularly its scientific level. I have found that using both of these resources together has helped me find good conferences to submit my papers to.

Submitting to a conference can be a time-consuming process, so it is important to choose wisely. I hope these resources help you find the perfect conference for your work!

The CNIL’s Privacy Research Day

The first CNIL’s International Conference on Research in Privacy took place in Paris yesterday, June 28, and was broadcast online for free. In addition to providing a great opportunity to consider the influence of research on regulation and vice versa, this conference facilitated the building of bridges between regulators and researchers.

During the day, experts from different fields presented their work and discussed its impact on regulation and vice-versa. I attended it online — there were many interesting topics covered by the different panelists. The topics ranged from the economics of privacy, smartphones and apps, AI and explanation, and more. Surely, one of the panels that I liked was that on AI and explanation. 

Machine learning algorithms are becoming more prevalent, so it is important to examine other factors in addition to optimal performance when evaluating them. Among these factors, privacy, ethics, and explainability should be given more attention. Many of the interesting pieces I see here are related to what I and my colleagues are working on right now and what I have planned for my upcoming projects.

You are welcome to contact me if you are curious about what I am working on and would want to collaborate.

Is Your Home Becoming A Spy?

On 9th October, I had the opportunity to present my paper at the IoT 2020 conference. I talked about smart connected homes to conference attendees participating in the security track. The presentation was pre-recorded and played to an online audience over Zoom.  It was in the format of a 12 mins presentation followed by 8 mins QA.

My presentation slot at IoT 2020.

The theme that I covered was about covert surveillance facilitated through commercial smart home systems retrofitted in homes around the globe.  In the study, we organized 81 systems by their data-collection capabilities with the intention of better understanding their privacy implications. Also, we identified research directions and suggested ways that allow users more control, transparency, and ethical uses over their personal data.

You can take a look at the presentation slides here. Also, please free to email me in case you need more information about my work.

How to Create an Effective Scientific Presentation in Little Time

As a researcher, one of the core chores you have to do in your academic journey is to deliver presentations. A presentation, whether it is for a workshop, conference, seminar, etc. can take you a while to compile. I remember some of my earlier talks took me quite a hefty amount of time to put together. Most of the time the challenge was how to structure the presentation in order to make it interesting for the attendees. In this article, I highlight the most important things that helped me organize a presentation and tips on how to create that in little time.

Creating an effective presentation

Similar to when organizing a manuscript, I tend to follow the IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) formula to put together a presentation.  Nonetheless, while it is important to mirror key parts of the corresponding paper; if it is a paper presentation;  the scope is that of using the presentation to encourage the audience to read the article instead of regurgitating it.  The model that I follow consists of 7 main points each corresponding to a slide heading or section to talk about. It starts with the title slide (point 1), followed by a body (point 2 – point 6), and ending with a closing slide (point 7).  Hereunder is the model:

  1. Title: Title slide indicating the title of the talk and authors
  2. Agenda: Presenting the structure or outline of the presentation
  3. Introduction:
    • Identify the research question, tested hypothesis, or research purpose
    • Justify the importance of such work
  4. Materials and Methods:
    • Indicate the equipment used and the experiment setup
    • Highlight the sampling technique and analysis method performed
  5. Results and Discussion:
    • Demonstrate through images, tables, or statements, the answer found to the research question or hypothesis
    • Underscore the  implications or relevance of the obtained results
  6. Final remarks:
    • Reiterate the objectives and provide a general statement on the extent to which you have accomplished them
    • Identify some avenues for future work
  7. Closing:
    • Question and answer session slide with your contact information
This model is typically useful for a talk that is longer than 10 minutes. For a short presentation, it is rarely necessary to have such an explicit structure and to cover all that is mentioned therein. This is as there is usually only enough time to introduce the topic and to give a brief introduction to the method or results.

  
Then, when it comes to the actual compilation of the presentation, I tend to use a number of utilities; mostly on Mac; implemented in the workflow below:

  1. Use Skim to open the PDF paper
  2. Highlight sections (Note Type -> Highlight) that are relevant to the presented model
  3. Copy the highlighted statements from the ‘Notes pane’ and load them to Notes app as a new note
  4. Assign and group the statements under the different model headings
  5. Reorganize, rephrase, and shorten/expand some statements
  6. Launch PowerPoint and create new slides following the previous step
  7. Refine and embellish by introducing images or icons, e.g., through Google Images or that you draw for instance using draw.io.

Other general tips:

  • Draw principles from real stories using specific data, anecdotes, or screenshots to back up the stories
  • Have one main idea per slide and limiting to no more than about 4-5 major bullets per slide
  • Use design templates for consistency
  • Check spelling and grammar for accuracy
  • Speak slowly, clearly, and loudly!

Take a look at some of my recent slides in Presentations.